Comparison Tool
COST · TIME · CARBON MODEL
Site & scenario
Optional — used to translate staff time saved into "additional patient appointments." Defaults to 20.
Cost impact
Estimated annual saving using Trio
—
Estimated 5-year saving
—
% saving vs. competitor
—
Same at any horizon
Carbon footprint impact
CO2e saved per year using Trio
—
CO2e saved over 5 years
—
Carbon reduction vs. competitor
—
Same at any horizon
Staff time impact
Staff time freed up per year
—
Staff time freed up over 5 years
—
Additional patient appointments/year
—
Based on the appointment length set below
Per-procedure comparison
Cost
Trio
—
Competitor
—
Carbon (kg CO2e)
Trio
—
Competitor
—
Cost per procedure by component
Total spend over time
Assumes today’s volume and prices held flat — no price escalation, no volume growth.
Opportunity cost of staff time
Extra process minutes the competitor takes vs. Trio, converted to working days freed up at this site’s volume (fixed 8-hour day) — time that could go to patient throughput or other clinical work instead of reprocessing.
Carbon footprint impact
Disinfectant/HLD wipe footprint only, wastage-adjusted the same way as cost, shown against the competitor being compared.